Home > Law of Evidence
Law of Evidence
- Sort by
- Mark
- Question
- Year
- Words
- Date submitted
Question: Outline the development of the Law of Evidence with reference to the evidence of spouses.
Details: - Mark: 70% | Course: Law of Evidence | Year: 2nd/3rd | Words: 2016 | References: No | Date written: February, 2006 | Date submitted: October 13, 2008 | Coursework ID: 38
Question: HOW HAVE THE COURTS’ BLURRING OF THE LINE BETWEEN CREDIT AND ISSUE AFFECTED THE LAW CONCERNING COLLATERAL ISSUES AND THE FINALITY RULE? IS THERE NEED FOR REFORM?
Details: - Mark: 67% | Course: Law of Evidence | Year: 2nd/3rd | Words: 3493 | References: Yes | Date written: April, 2003 | Date submitted: October 20, 2008 | Coursework ID: 151
Question: 'There can be no legal definition of the term ‘relevance’, relevance must be assessed according to logic and the common course of events.'
Discuss.
Details: - Mark: 67% | Course: Law of Evidence | Year: 2nd/3rd | Words: 3036 | References: Yes | Date written: March, 2006 | Date submitted: April 05, 2011 | Coursework ID: 661
Question: Outine and evaluate the contentious area of compellability within the criminal law.
Details: - Mark: 64% | Course: Law of Evidence | Year: 2nd/3rd | Words: 2164 | References: Yes | Date written: November, 2007 | Date submitted: September 29, 2008 | Coursework ID: 6
Question: When psychologists act as expert witnesses a number of issues are raised surrounding the admissibility of their evidence. Discuss these issues with reference to eyewitness testimony and domestic violence, then make suggestions as to how these issues might be resolved.
Details: - Mark: 64% | Course: Law of Evidence | Year: 2nd/3rd | Words: 3252 | References: No | Date written: Not available | Date submitted: February 20, 2009 | Coursework ID: 418
Question: Analyse current UK Law relating to the admissibility of expert opinion evidence in criminal trials.
Details: - Mark: 63% | Course: Law of Evidence | Year: 2nd/3rd | Words: 3420 | References: Yes | Date written: October, 2004 | Date submitted: October 11, 2008 | Coursework ID: 23
Question: Assess the Law with respect to the competence and compellability of spouses in criminal proceedings.
Details: - Mark: 63% | Course: Law of Evidence | Year: 2nd/3rd | Words: 2990 | References: Yes | Date written: Not available | Date submitted: October 20, 2008 | Coursework ID: 154
Question: Critically evaluate the importance of judicial discretion to exclude evidence, with particular regard to evidence unlawfully, improperly or unfairly obtained and consider how, if at all judicial discretion has been affected by the Human rights act 1998. Two part question: 1) How important is the discretion to exclude evidence? 2) How much has judicial discretion been affected by the human rights act?
Details: - Mark: 63% | Course: Law of Evidence | Year: 2nd/3rd | Words: 2356 | References: Yes | Date written: November, 2003 | Date submitted: February 20, 2009 | Coursework ID: 420
Question: It is time the rule against hearsay evidence in criminal proceedings was abolished and brought into line with the rule in civil proceedings. Discuss.
Details: - Mark: 62% | Course: Law of Evidence | Year: 1st | Words: 2005 | References: No | Date written: Not available | Date submitted: October 20, 2008 | Coursework ID: 153
Question: How reliable is Eyewitness Testimony?
Details: - Mark: 60% | Course: Law of Evidence | Year: 1st | Words: 1954 | References: Yes | Date written: April, 2003 | Date submitted: October 20, 2008 | Coursework ID: 152
